|
Formal verification for post-quantum security
|
| bet | 6/7 | | Sana | 13.06.2024 | | Hajmi | 32,91 Kb. | | #263324 |
Bog'liq A.javohirFormal verification for post-quantum security: Adapting formal verification methods to ensure the security of post-quantum hash functions against quantum attacks.
Case Study: Analyzing the Collision Resistance of SHA-3
This section delves into the collision resistance analysis of SHA-3 (Keccak), a modern cryptographic hash function known for its robust security. We will explore how different analysis methods can be applied to assess the collision tolerance of SHA-3.
1. Theoretical Attacks:
Birthday Attack:
The birthday bound for a collision attack on SHA-3 (256-bit output) is approximately 2^128. This immense number of elements required makes a successful birthday attack computationally infeasible with current technology.
2. Cryptanalysis Competitions:
SHA-3 was the winner of an open competition organized by NIST in 2012. This rigorous competition attracted researchers worldwide to attempt cryptanalysis of submitted hash functions. While the competition did not uncover any collisions, it identified minor weaknesses in some competing algorithms, solidifying SHA-3's position as a highly secure design.
3. Formal Verification:
The SHA-3 design process incorporated formal verification techniques to mathematically prove the absence of specific vulnerabilities within the algorithm. This adds a layer of confidence in the theoretical security of SHA-3.
4. Empirical Analysis:
Extensive empirical analysis has been conducted on SHA-3 implementations. This involves running the hash function on massive datasets and meticulously analyzing the distribution of outputs. To date, no significant biases or anomalies have been discovered that might indicate underlying weaknesses in the algorithm.
5. Statistical Analysis:
Statistical tests have been employed to assess the randomness and uniformity of SHA-3's output distribution. These tests haven't revealed any statistically significant deviations from expected behavior, further supporting the collision resistance of SHA-3.
|
| |
