21
G
The first approach would consist of focusing on road transport solely through pricing.
This option would not be accompanied by complementary measures in the other modes
of transport. In the short term it might curb the growth in road transport through the better
loading ratio of goods vehicles and occupancy rates of passenger vehicles expected as a result of
the increase in the price of transport. However, the lack of measures available to revitalise other
modes of transport would make it impossible for more sustainable modes of transport to take up
the baton.
H
The second approach also concentrates on road transport pricing but is accompanied by
measures to increase the efficiency of the other modes (better quality of services,
logistics, technology). However, this approach does not include investment in new infrastructure, nor
does it guarantee better regional cohesion. It could help to achieve greater uncoupling than the
first approach, but road transport
would keep the lion‟s share of the market and continue
to concentrate on saturated arteries, despite being the most polluting of the modes. It is therefore not
enough to guarantee the necessary shift of the balance.
I
The third approach, which is not new, comprises a series of measures ranging from pricing to
revitalising alternative modes of transport and targeting investment in the trans-
European network. This integrated approach would allow the market shares of the other modes to
return to their 1998 levels and thus make a shift of balance. It is far more ambitious than it looks,
bearing in mind the historical imbalance in favour of roads for the last fifty years, but would achieve a
marked break in the link between road transport growth and economic growth, without placing
restrictions on the mobility of people and goods.