|
Komilov Javokhir Kozimjon ugli, Khasanov Diyorjon Ramish ugli
|
| bet | 2/2 | | Sana | 22.11.2023 | | Hajmi | 15,81 Kb. | | #103647 |
Bog'liq Komilov J.K. Metalinguistic Peculiarities of GraphicResearch Methodology. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses of graphic communication in online forums and social media platforms. A data set of graphic elements was collected from various sources, and their usage patterns were examined.
Results and Discussion. Diverse Functions of Graphic Communication. Graphic elements in internet language serve multiple functions: expressing emotions, enhancing humor, conveying information concisely, and transcending language barriers. Emojis, for instance, help users express nuances that plain text cannot convey.
Evolution of Language. Graphic communication is driving linguistic evolution on the internet. It is not merely decorative but a fundamental aspect of online language. As users continue to innovate with graphics, language adapts to accommodate these changes [Herring, 2001].
Conclusions. This study reveals that graphic communication within internet language is not a superficial trend but a transformation force. Emojis, memes, and other graphic elements are integral to online discourse. They enhance communication by conveying emotions and contextual information efficiently.
Recommendations
Linguistic Studies. Further linguistic research is needed to delve deeper into the impact of graphic communication on language evolution. Studies could explore how different cultures use graphic elements and their implications for cross-cultural communication.
Educational Integration. Educational institutions should consider integrating internet language and graphic communication into curricula. This would help students navigate the digital landscape effectively.
Standardization. As graphic communication gains importance, standardization efforts might be necessary. Developing guidelines for the use of emojis and memes in formal contexts could promote clarity and consistency.
References
Baron, N. S. (2015). Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. Oxford University Press.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166-195.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V., Stévaux, C., & Brone, G. S. (2017). Emojis, language and culture in context. Language Sciences, 60, 34-40.
Jones, R. H. (2015). The emergence of the digital humanities. Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. F., Sperry, R. W., & Mitchell, D. W. (2016). The emergence of emojis as a new form of language. Social Science Research Network.
Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the occupy Wall Street movement. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2357-2390.
Phillips, W. (2015). This is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: The Origins, Evolution, and Cultural Impact of Internet Memes. MIT Press.
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. Sage.
Zhang, Q. (2020). Emoji and Internet Language: A Study in Multimodal Digital Communication. Routledge.
|
| |
