symbolizing Volumes with Polygons: choroplethic maps




Download 16,37 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet107/174
Sana29.11.2023
Hajmi16,37 Mb.
#107721
1   ...   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   ...   174
Bog'liq
Judith A. Tyner. Principles of map design. New York. „The Guilford Press”, 2010

symbolizing Volumes with Polygons: choroplethic maps
If data have been collected for statistical areas, such as census tracts, counties, and 
the like, instead of at sample points, such as temperature or rainfall, or if the distribu-
tion is discontinuous, the statistical surface will be step-like, and one of the chorop-
lethic techniques will be a suitable method for symbolizing the data.
On a choropleth map, each enumeration area is shaded or colored uniformly 
according to the value represented. There are three kinds of choroplethic maps: the 
simple choropleth, the dasymetric choropleth, and the unclassed choropleth. The 
visual variables most appropriate are value and texture. Choropleth maps are the 
most common type of quantitative map produced with GIS.
Choropleth
Isopleth
fIgURe 8.17. 
The statistical surface formed by choropleth and isopleth symbols. Adapted 
from Thrower, Norman J. W. (2008). Copyright 2008 by University of Chicago Press. 
Adapted by permission.
z
x
y
fIgURe 8.18. 
The statistical surface is an imaginary 3D surface where x and y represent 
location and z represents value.


Designing and Choosing symbols 161
simple Choropleth
Conceptually, the simple choropleth is a relatively uncomplicated type of symbol. 
Values are determined for each enumeration area and then placed into categories 
or classes; shading patterns or hue lightness steps are chosen for each category and 
applied to the enumeration areas. The number of classes is limited by the number that 
the human eye can recognize. Very little information is needed other than boundaries 
and values (Figure 8.19).
LiMiTaTiOns OF siMPLe CHOROPLeTH
Because shading or patterns cover each enumeration area uniformly, it is not possible 
to show variation within enumeration areas. This is a limitation of the choropleth 
symbol. Thus, a choropleth map should not be used when the purpose is to compare 
enumeration areas. Figure 8.20 illustrates this problem. In the county highlighted, 
the population is concentrated in one corner, but the uniform shading can give an 
inexperienced reader the impression that population is evenly spread throughout the 
county.
The boundary lines on choropleth maps have no values attached to them; they 
are simply the lines outlining the enumeration area polygon: county or state boundar-
ies, census tract borders, or Zip code boundaries, for example. A change in pattern 
or color does not represent a change in value along the boundary line. It only tells the 
reader that the two adjoining areas have different values. This is a second limitation 
of choropleth maps: exact values cannot be determined.
United States Population Density
Population Per 
Sq. Mi.
Over 1000
501-1000
101-500
11-100
1-10

Download 16,37 Mb.
1   ...   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   ...   174




Download 16,37 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish

Bosh sahifa
Aloqalar

    Bosh sahifa



symbolizing Volumes with Polygons: choroplethic maps

Download 16,37 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish