A. Z. Azman et al., Journal of Electronic Voltage and Application Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) p. 49-55
50
the event log of the protocol. Furthermore, the information about interfaces needs to configure so that each device's
neighbours can be displayed in their area and get the entire EIGRP topology entries.
2.
Related Work
Karna et al. [4] did the performance analysis of Interior Gateway Protocol (IGPs) using GNS3. They took ten
generic routers, and calculate the packet loss, jitter, convergence time, end-to-end delay, throughput, one by one on the
three routing protocols. The protocols that have been simulated are RIP, EIGRP and OSPF. On the other hand,
performance evaluation of routing protocol RIPv2, OSPF, EIGRP with BGP has been conducted by Masruroh et al. [5],
simulation proses using GNS3 to analyze the performance of a network based on convergence, throughput, jitter and
packet loss that combine the IGPs with External Gateway Protocol (BGP). While the performance analysis of OSPF
and EIGRP routing protocols for Greener Internetworking was compared and resulting of EIGRP uses fewer system
resources and produces lesser heat, unlike OSPF [6]. Therefore, the resources are saved in networking.
Those researchers did the evaluation and analysis with multiple protocols to make the comparison. But, Kontšek
and Segeč [7] use only EIGRP implementations to test the network's current open-source. The topology consists of 4
main routers which are Quangga, FRR, OpenBSD and Cisco. With these routers, EIGRP is testing the process of IPv4
and IPv6 protocols. The experiment results are that only FRR and OpenBSD implementations of EIGRP are stable, but
they need some more advanced features to complete the feature set.
