Prophylaxis versus rescue treatment




Download 1,5 Mb.
bet137/654
Sana03.01.2022
Hajmi1,5 Mb.
#14803
1   ...   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   ...   654
Prophylaxis versus rescue treatment

There does not appear to be additional benefit from prophylactic surfactant compared to nasal CPAP and early rescue surfactant 4, 6 (LOE I, GOR B).



Method of administration

Post-ventilatory surfactant (after resuscitation) reduces mortality and chronic lung disease 36-40 weeks 7 (LOE II, GOR B).

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) with rescue thin catheter surfactant versus nCPAP with rescue intubation and surfactant reduces the risk of intubation and pneumothorax and reduces the incidence of chronic lung disease 8-12 (LOE I, GOR B).

Nasal CPAP with rescue thin catheter surfactant is better tolerated than nCPAP with rescue intubation and surfactant and immediate extubation (InSurE) with no difference in other clinical outcomes 10-12 (LOE I, GOR B).



Dose

Higher first dose poractant (200 mg/kg compared to 100 mg/kg) reduces need for re-dosing without proven clinical benefit 13,14 (LOE 1, GOR B). Higher dose poractant 200 mg/kg compared to lower dose beractant 100 mg/kg reduces mortality and need for re-dosing 15-17 (LOE 1, GOR B).

Multiple doses of surfactant (up to 4) given to infants with ongoing respiratory insufficiency leads to improved clinical outcomes 18 (LOE 1, GOR A).

Meconium aspiration syndrome: Surfactant replacement therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome reduces the incidence of respiratory failure 19 (LOE 1, GOR B). Trials used surfactant 100−200 mg/kg every 6 hours up to a maximum 4 doses. Trials reported response from earlier (before 6 hours) and frequent surfactant replacement (every 6 hours for 3−4 doses) 20, 21.




Download 1,5 Mb.
1   ...   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   ...   654




Download 1,5 Mb.

Bosh sahifa
Aloqalar

    Bosh sahifa



Prophylaxis versus rescue treatment

Download 1,5 Mb.