the articles from that event, .... you know.... , as it’s
said in the proverb ‘half a loaf is better than no bread’.
.... Now... Miss Karimova....
First, one should
be taught to use multiple
sources properly. Because lectures, interviews
novels, electronic media and surely internet which
are believed to be multiple sources materials are not
that easy to understand
and mostly demand great
analytical procedure. Take as an example..., long
and less constructed documents tend to be more
confusing. Subsequently, picking up information here
is much more challenging then in short and well-
structured texts. Comparing with single sources,
multiple sources tend to create richer understanding,
engage
with facts, circumstances and can be even
conflicting. The matter, one should be taught is
analyzing
commonalities, evaluating conflicts and
ability to filter the context so that it fits worked out
objective.
As for me....
... o.. yes Mr. Bakhodirov If speaking about
multiple sources I consider
it necessary to provide
learners with some recommendations:
First of all read your primary source thoroughly
to provide factual framework from which to begin,
as it was mentioned by (miss Karimova) find out the
objective. Refer to shorter,
more focused sources;
improve your evaluative skills working with multiple
sources; understand the connection and don’t learn
by heart details which can be easily forgotten; attend
seminars discussions and conferences to improve your
conception,.... Again as it was said by (M r Tursunov):
‘try to work with primary sources’. Nevertheless, don’t
give up if not possible feel, free to refer to secondary
one - publication.
