|
26 may 2022 3-to’plam 16-bet Kichik maktab
Pdf ko'rish
|
| bet | 140/210 | | Sana | 25.01.2024 | | Hajmi | 2,85 Mb. | | #145888 |
Bog'liq 26-11-PBwww.pedagoglar.uz
26-son 3 –to’plam may 2022
Sahifa: 164
It suffices to mention one or two typical CLs of the category and the
corresponding “list finalizer”, e.g. etcetera:...Some languages, like English,
lexicalize or semi-lexicalize them by means of modal verbs ('may', 'must', etc.),
modal adjectives ('possible', etc.), modal adverbs ('possibly', etc.) and modal
particles ('perhaps', etc.)
СОNСLUSIОN
So, in the process of communication, situations often arise in which the
actualization of the language units of the category of uncertainty occurs. They can
be caused by the elimination of redundant data, doubt, ignorance of the nuances of
the issue, the use of various diplomatic moves, silence, ambivalence, lack of
interest in the subject of conversation or a person, limited lexical resources of the
language or ignorance of it, etc.
RЕFЕRЕNСЕS
1. Adamovich S. V. The semantic category of approximation and the system of
means of its expression. Grodno: GrGU, 2011. 183 p.
2. Druzhinin A. S., Pesina S. A. The figure of the observer as a key factor in the
semantic interpretation of tenses in teaching English grammar // Filologicheskie
nauki. Questions of theory and practice. 2017. No. 11. S. 194–197.
3. Karasik V.I. Interpretive modes of communication // Uchenye zapiski
Taurida nat. un-ta im. V. I. Vernadsky. Ser.: Philology. Social communications.
2011. V. 24 (63), No. 1, part 1. S. 255–262.
4. Martynova I. A. Lexical markers of uncertainty in colloquial English
discourse. Vestnik VGU. Series: linguistics and intercultural communication.
2016. No. 2. P. 30–34.
5. Nazarova O. L., Pesina S. A. The social character of the language as a set of
collective typified sign situations // Questions of Cognitive Linguistics. 2016.
No. 3. P. 134–140.
|
| |
