|
Vocabulary Learning Strategies of English as Foreign Language (EFL)
|
| bet | 4/7 | | Sana | 13.06.2022 | | Hajmi | 69.01 Kb. | | #23598 |
Bog'liq Alijonova Gulnora Developing vocabulary by using effective language learning strategies Assessment 1 (Topshiriq), 0002kUYISH DARAJALARI YORDAM KO`RSATISH, L ishi Andijon mashina-WPS Office3.Vocabulary Learning Strategies of English as Foreign Language (EFL)
Language learning strategies are methods that students employ to enhance their own learning. Strategies are important for language learning because they are a device for active, selfresponsible learning. Students take more control of their own learning, which is necessary for developing academic competence. Learners who use appropriate language learning strategies yielded greater proficiency and self-confidence (Oxford, 1990). Most of the literature which has been studied provides a similar point of view and highlights the importance of having vocabulary learning strategies. It does not mean that the strategies are only limited to the learners, it is equally important to the teachers as it is to the learners. Having knowledge about the different types of choices in vocabulary learning strategies will help teachers, researchers and curriculum developers to design appropriate materials for classroom purposes. Vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) are intuitively appealing to teachers and learners. It has also become a popular research topic among researchers in the last two decades.
Sanaoui identified two distinctive approaches to vocabulary learning of adult learners: those who structured their vocabulary learning and those who did not. Structured learners engaged in independent study, did self-initiated learning activities and recorded the lexical items they were learning, reviewed such records, and practiced using vocabulary items outside the classroom (Bastanfar & Hashemi, 2010). Sanaoui’s research showed that structured Learners were more successful than those who followed an unstructured approach.
Furthermore, Gu and Johnson identified six types of strategy - guessing, dictionary, note-taking, rehearsal, encoding, and activation - together with two other factors: beliefs about vocabulary learning and metacognitive regulation. Metacognitive regulation consists of strategies for selective attention and self-initiation. The latter make the meaning of vocabulary items clear through the use of a variety of means. Guessing strategies, skillful use of dictionaries and note-taking strategies are labeled as cognitive strategies. Rehearsal and encoding categories are classified under memory strategies. Word lists and repetition are instances of rehearsal strategies. Encoding strategies include strategies such as association, imagery, visual, auditory, semantic, and contextual encoding as well as word-structure. Activation strategies include those strategies through which learners actually use new words in different contexts.
In addition, Lawson and Hogben, in a classification which is more a reflection of the strategies, categorized the four strategies as: repetition, word feature analysis, simple elaboration and complex elaboration. The strategy “repetition” includes reading of related words, simple rehearsal, writing of word and meaning, cumulative rehearsal and testing. The “word feature analysis” contains spelling, word classification and suffix. Simple elaboration consists of sentence translation, simple use of context, appearance similarity, sound link and complex elaboration includes complex use of context, paraphrase and mnemonic. In the research, it was found that learners who had used a greater range of learning strategies recalled more of the learned words later. However, all the learners alike tended to favor simple repetition strategies over more complex elaboration strategies, despite the fact that the latter yielded higher recall. Hence the researchers concluded that there is a need to present strategies more directly during language teaching since students are not aware of the advantages of these procedures3.
Schmitt devised his taxonomy, self-reportedly, in response to the lack of a comprehensive list of vocabulary learning strategies. He organized 58 strategies under five types: determination, social, memory, cognitive and metacognitive. His categories were inspired by Oxford's inventory of general language learning strategies but included some modifications. Thus, social, memory, cognitive and metacognitive strategies have been adopted from Oxford. The modification was that he made a distinction between discovery and consolidation strategies. Determination strategies are used when "learners are faced with discovering a new word's meaning without recourse to another person's experience". For example, learners try to discover the meaning of a new word by guessing it with the help of context, structural knowledge of language, and reference materials. It is also possible to discover the meaning of a word through asking someone for help. Finally, Nation's theoretically-oriented taxonomy makes a basic distinction between the aspects of vocabulary knowledge from the sources of vocabulary knowledge and from learning processes; hence, three general classes: planning, sources, and processes, each covering a subset of key strategies. 'Planning' involves choosing where and how to focus attention on a particular vocabulary item and contains strategies for choosing words, choosing aspects of word knowledge and choosing strategies as well as planning repetition. 'Sources' involves finding information about the word from the word form itself, from the context, from a reference source such as dictionaries or glossaries and from analogies and connections with other languages. Process means establishing word knowledge through noticing, retrieving and generating strategies.
In all research conducted on vocabulary learning strategies, four important categories are highlighted which are metacognitive strategies, cognitive, memory and activation strategies. It is very important to understand these concepts as it forms the basis of the any study being conducted in this field.
Gu and Johnson list second language (L2) vocabulary learning strategies as metacognitive, cognitive, memory and activation strategies. The metacognitive strategies comprises of selective attention and self-initiation strategies. First language learners and Second language learners who employ selective attention strategies know which words are important for them to learn and are essential for adequate comprehension of a passage. Learners employing self-initiation strategies use a variety of means to make the meaning of vocabulary items clear.
Cognitive strategies in Gu and Johnson’s taxonomy consists of guessing strategies, skillful use of dictionaries and note-taking strategies. It was found that learners using guessing strategies draw upon their background knowledge and use linguistic clues like grammatical structures of a sentence to guess the meaning of a word. Memory strategies are classified into two distinct categories; rehearsal and encoding categories. Word lists and repetition are instances of rehearsal strategies. Encoding strategies encompass such strategies as association, imagery, visual, auditory, semantic, and contextual encoding as well as word structure which includes; analyzing a word in terms of prefixes, stems, and suffixes.
Finally, the activation strategies include those strategies through which the learners actually use new words in different contexts. For instance, learners may set sentences using the words they have just learned.
The definitions of the above concepts are simplified in the following illustration:
Apart from discovering new words, Ghazal states that learners need to employ a variety of strategies to practice and retain vocabulary. In order to accommodate this, learners thus, use a variety of social, memory, cognitive and metacognitive strategies to consolidate their vocabulary knowledge.
Each learner employs different strategies to assist in learning new vocabulary. A learning strategy is a series of actions a learner takes to facilitate the completion of a learning task. The learner brings to the language learning situation a wide spectrum of individual differences that will influence the learning rate and the ultimate learning result. The most widely reported learner factors include age, sex, language aptitude, intelligence, prior knowledge, motivation, selfconcept/image, personality, and cognitive and learning style. This brings forth the concept of good learners and poor learners; those learners who are highly motivated feel a genuine need to practice the vocabulary and use this strategy to maintain the vocabulary. Good learners not only use more strategies, but they also rely more heavily on different strategies than the ones poor learners use4.
In a study carried out by Ahmed it was found that good learners were more aware of what they could learn about words, they paid more attention to collation and spelling and at the same time they were more conscious of contextual learning. Learners are able to comprehend more new vocabulary once they use a number of strategies and do not simply stick to one which is the case for poor learners who concentrate on one method simply. On the contrary, the article by Scafaru and Tofan is very contradictory of this statement as it further mentions that statements like “the good learners practice” are not really helpful. What we need are more specific findings which tell us what the learner actually does when he practices”. In fact, it is through practice that learners commit words to memory and thus use it as confirmed by Peter. Some learners will repeat the new word a number of times until they are comfortable with it. Others will go beyond simple rote repetition to commit the word to memory. These types of strategies are part of practice which is used by the good learners.
|
| |
