Tilshunoslikdagi zamonaviy yo
‘
nalishlar: muammo va yechimlar
69
methodological, and constructive features. Therefore, onomastic research should be
carried out on a synchronous and diachronic basis on the basis of a systemic and
historical-comparative method. Names have a social significance, they reflect the
cultural and social life of society. Names also indicate the lineage of a particular
person and his or her place in society. Each name appears for a specific reason. A
large part of the vocabulary of the Uzbek language consists of special names given
to people. Famous names of people are called anthroponyms in science.
Anthroponym (Latin: anthropos - man, onima - name, name) means the name of a
person. One branch of onomastics that studies the characteristics of human names is
anthroponymy. Anthroponyms have their place in the
structure of the language
dictionary and have structural features. In particular, anthroponyms belonging to the
system of famous horses, in turn, are divided into other smaller systems. These are:
1. Names;
2. Surnames;
3. Father's names;
4. Nicknames;
5. Nicknames.
The successful defense of two PhD and one doctoral dissertation, which
emerged after the granting of state status to the Uzbek language, shows that
anthroponymic research is extremely relevant and its comprehensive study is a
modern requirement. The subject of research
consists of structural,
linguoculturological and lexico-semantic features of bilingual personality systems.
The research is based on the following hypothesis: national anthroponyms (nominal
names) of unrelated heterogeneous languages are formed simultaneously under the
influence of globalization and national identification processes. A number of
introlinguistic and extralinguistic factors, including religion: two branches of
Christianity (Anglican and Orthodox) and Islam, as well as socio-cultural traditions
of naming (names-desires, names-associations, etc.) are significant in the formation
of national identity affects. The aim of the research is a comprehensive semantic,
structural, structural and etymological analysis of the anthroponyms of two
languages with different structures and to identify similarities and differences
between them.
Scientific novelty lies in the novelty of the research material and its approach.
For the first time in the work, a comprehensive structural, lexical-semantic, socio-
cultural comparative analysis of the national anthroponymy of the Russian and
Uzbek languages was carried out. It reveals and systematizes the lexical, structural,
and paremic features of personal names.
Anthroponymy is considered as a branch of onomastics, and anthroponymy as
an object of complex linguoculturological and lexico-semantic
research;
Tilshunoslikdagi zamonaviy yo
‘
nalishlar: muammo va yechimlar
70
-Anthroponymy and its role as a socio-cultural symbol in a multi-ethnic
multicultural world.
Extralinguistic and linguistic factors influencing the formation of national
anthroponymy
-Comparative structural analysis of personal names and ways of derivation -
The ratio of simple, derivative and complex anthroponyms in national
anthroponyms, hypocoristic names in national anthroponyms.
The semantics and
etymology of Uzbek and Russian anthroponyms were discussed by Y. Menajiev, H.
Azamatov, D. Abdurahmanov and E. Begmatov "What is the meaning of your
name?" sought a practical solution in his pamphlet entitled. S. Ibragimov (1961,
1967), N. Mamatov (1958), F. Kamolov, R. Jumaniyozov, Y. Pinkhasov, T. Mirzaev,
E. Begmatov (1962) devoted to the problems of spelling and spelling of Uzbek
names in Russian articles by such scholars were published in the press. E.
Begmatov's works "Spelling of human names" (Tashkent, 1970), "Spelling of Uzbek
names" (Tashkent, 1972), "Literary names and surnames of Uzbek authors in
Russian transcription" (Tashkent, 1981) The scientific study of anthroponyms has
also been the subject of a number of scientific studies in the later development of our
lives. In particular, ETSmirnov, later NSLikoshin and Russian traveler and
etymologist VFOshanin, turkologist A. Samoylovich
conducted research on the
collection of Uzbek names and their expression in Russian transliteration. Linguists
such as N. Ostroumov, A. Samoylovich, S. Oldenburg, V. Ya. Nalivkin, M.
Nalivkina in their works also expressed their views on some issues of etymology,
ethnography of Uzbek names and nicknames, issues of their traditions. was also in
the spotlight. S. Ibragimov and M. Rahmon made observations on the spelling of
Uzbek names and surnames, while NS Malitsky studied the names of local people in
Tashkent.
There is a problem in Uzbek and Russian anthroponymy, which is related to
poetic or artistic anthroponymy. That is, human names used in works of art, in
general, famous names, serve to express not only a nominative function, but also a
number of functional-stylistic features. This issue
was later studied in Uzbek
anthroponymy. For example, at SamSU EB Magazanik defended his dissertation on
this topic, and later published a monograph. This study examines the nature of
anthroponyms as a linguistic category, onomastilistics, and its degree of study in
Russian literature. In his research, the scientist considers the anthroponyms used in
works of art in a very broad context, the plot of the work of art, the role of human
names in the expression of conflict. For example, according to the scientist, in the
works of AS Pushkin, the name of the hero and his name are phonetically
synonymous. Such a phonetic melody is also characteristic of the surnames and
names of the heroes of M. Yu. Lermontov: like Eugene ArbENin.
Tilshunoslikdagi zamonaviy yo
‘
nalishlar: muammo va yechimlar
71
In conclusion, one of the important tasks of linguists is to pay attention to the
lexical and semantic features of Uzbek-Russian anthroponyms, as this field has not
yet been fully studied. This may arouse some people’s interest in their last names. It
should be noted that the scope of research on Uzbek and Russian anthroponymy is
expanding and is yielding results.
