Tilshunoslikdagi zamonaviy yo
‘
nalishlar: muammo va yechimlar
126
7)
composite sentence and its place in the syntactic system;
8)
aspects of the composite sentence;
9)
classification of composite sentence according to existing syntactic
relations between its components;
10) composite sentence and its textual nature and others.
Despite this complex sentence, as well as a compound one, representing the
subtypes of composite sentence which has a specific structure and semantics and at
the same time is addressed with its various sides to other syntactic units, it remains
one of the most difficult and vexed sections of general syntactic theory and, as a
subject of research, is still of primary interest /see: Maximov, 1971, 3/. This is due
to the fact that although considerable progress has been achieved in the study of
composite sentences both in domestic
and foreign syntactic science, there are a
number of topical problems in the study and description of composite sentences from
the standpoint of general and typological syntax.
So, firstly, the special literature available for the study of composite sentences
in special, comparative and typological linguistics needs to be generalized, which
would contribute to the definition of the general linguistic nature of SP as a large
type of syntactic unit characteristic of any natural language, although certain types
or subtypes of SP are not equally common in languages of different systems.
Secondly, the conceptual and terminological apparatus of the composite
sentences itself needs a serious streamlining, clarification and generalization, and if
necessary, rethinking and unification, because a huge number of concepts and terms
have accumulated in modern syntactic science.
Secondly, the conceptual and terminological apparatus of the SP itself needs
serious ordering, clarification and generalization, and, if necessary, rethinking and
unification, because in modern syntactic science a huge number of concepts and
terms have accumulated, with which linguists operate
in the study of composite
sentences, and which for the most part are of a particular language in nature due to
the well-established terminology tradition of each specific language. Moreover,
these terms and concepts themselves are very vague and ambiguous / compare:
complex sentence - period /Mukhin, 1968, Vardul, 1974/, complex sentence -
polypredicative sentence /SSPP, 1980/, complex sentence - hyper-complex
(polynomial) /Zakiev, 1983/, multicomponential composite sentence /Admoni,
1982, Kalashnikova, 1981, Gamidov, 1977/, polypredicative composite sentence -
polypredicative unit /Ukhanov, 1981/ complex sentence - composite sentence of
complicated structure, /Gavrilova, 1981/, a complex sentence, a compound sentence,
a complex sentence, the main clause - subordinate clause,
the main subordinate
components of a composite sentence - predicative units /Iofik, 1965/, a whole
sentence, an elementary sentence /Admoni, 1982/ etc. - in Russian studies; qo‘shma
