Tilshunoslikdagi zamonaviy yo
‘
nalishlar: muammo va yechimlar
124
2)
to determine the status of a complicated sentence as a "special syntactic
unit of the transitional type in the sentence subsystem";
3)
to substantiate the specificity of the distribution of complicated
sentences on the scale of transition from convergence with a simple,
complex
sentence to convergence with complex ones;
4)
to consider such complicating categories as:
a)
homogeneity;
b)
separation;
c)
clarification;
d)
direct address;
e)
category of introduction (вводности) /Dmitrieva, 1981, 6-7/, which in
general the author has done very scrupulously.
Another work in the same direction is devoted to the study of compоsite
sentences with a conjunctive connection in modern Russian, the multicomponential
structure of which can include from four to eight components /Kalashnikova, 1981,
19/.
In her work, G. F. Kalashnikova considers multicomponential composite
sentences with a conjunctive connection as a separate structural type of sentence, she
also made an attempt to identify the main factors that cause the existence and
functioning of such units in language and speech.
There are three such factors,
according to the author of the work:
1) semantic;
2) structural /named by the author as "internal"/;
3) extralinguistic (external) /Kalashnikova, 1981, 33/.
Of undoubted scientific and theoretical interest is also the work of G. A.
Zolotova "Communicative aspects of Russian syntax" (1982), in which the author
aims to describe the types of auto-semantic syntactic units, including composite
sentences from the point of view of their communicative-pragmatic functioning in
the language, which is valuable for general linguistics /Zolotova, 1982/.
The work of E. V. Goldina aims to study three-componential compound
sentences in modern Russian. The author chose complex sentences of three-
componential structure only with constructive relations between components as the
object of her research, which makes it different from other works /Goldina, 1989, 3/.
Familiarization with special literature on composite
sentences and related
larger syntactic constructions /Yakovlev, 1981; Zenzerov, 1990 and others/ shows
that the theory of large syntactic units close to composite sentences is just beginning
to develop, but there is still no clear distinction between multicomponential
composite sentences and the so-called supraphrasal units, or complicated syntactic
wholes, respectively, there are still no clear, well-founded definitions of composite
